Financial position: Based on the fiscal paternity in 2009 Johnson & Jonson total net income is $12B, so this is an indicator that the financial position for Johnson & Johnson is very rock-steady and thats why we ingest it a high rate. For proctor & Gamble the total net income is tight $11B and its less than J&J, like for Novartis total income is $8B so we put them same rate. Advertising: P&R have the highest consumption on advertising with $4.18B according to Ad Age, and past J&J comes next with $2.1B, and the Novartis is the lowest company that spent on advertising. R&D: Include the number of product innovations the steady brings to commercialize, the more the company spent on R&D the more it will produced products first, hence steal the more trade share. Novartis is highest company that pays for R&D in 2009 with $7.5B, J&J spent $7B its not that different between both companies, hence P&G follow them and spent $3.2B.
Management: We didnt recognize any differences to say that one company is better than the face-to-face in the field of management, but in general on the whole these three companies have a very good answer management staff and thats why we gave them a same rate. intersection quality: The physical integrity of products created by the firm, Since each(prenominal) these companies canvas away with sensitive product that touches people life, they should ensure that they pinch all the requirements, so all pharmaceutical companies have virtually exchangeable standards to know if the quality of products have met or not.If you motive to line a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment