Comparing Housman's and Updike's poems that have two totally different attitudes toward athletes.

In A.E. Housmans poetry To an Athletes Dying Young and tin can Updikes poem Ex- hoops Player, each of the speakers use two different types of attitudes toward the athletes. In A.E. Housmans poem, his sort of thinking about the athlete is negative. Smart lad, to docking betimes away From field where glory does non stay And proterozoic though the laurel grows It shrivel quicker than the rose. (955) The author expresses that the stopping point of this young athlete fleck he was famous was divulge than growing old and go through losing it. So set, in advance its echoes fade, The fleet foot on the sill of shade, And aim to the low coping up The still- defended challenge-cup.(955) To die famous is better than dying(p) a nonexistence which many athletes end up doing. On the early(a) hand John Updikes state of mind toward athletes is sad. He was good: in fact, the best. In 46 He bucketed three hundred ninety points,A county record still. The be loved interchange. (1) The aut hor shows that photographic film was so great at one point in his life, so good that Flick never though of learning new skills because he would non need them to play basketball.

He never learned a trade, he just sells gas, Checks oil, and changes flats. Once in a while, As a gag, he dribbles an inner tube, But most of us remember anyway.(1) Now Flicks life is energy more than sempiternal job of doing crap. Basketball was non a career that never ended because it does end once somebody better or young comes along to take a place of an quondam(a) player. The author revels the haunting truth that you faecal matter not be the best forever. ! If you want to get a sufficient essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper