Theme Of Social Change And Freedom English Literature Essay

Theme Of Social Change And immunity English Literature EssayIn both the biddings The Cherry orchard by Anton Chekhov and A Dolls House by Henry Ibsen the protagonist is a woman. Madame Ranevsky of the The Cherry woodlet and Nora Helmer of the A Dolls House both find themselves enchain and victims of the social norms existing at that period and their own personal past. In the beginning both Nora and Madame Ranevskys lives were moulded to comply with social norms but the play sees their exploitation from controlled women to the commutative characters free from social constraints as intimately as burthen of their past memories. This evolution towards their freedom was both the consequence as well as catalyst for furthering the social deepen in society at large, although several characters in both the plays like Firs and Trophimof deal with the potential contravention among social progress and social change and doubt the effectiveness of the Liberation. furthermore emancipati on of serfs has led Lopakhin previously a serf into flourishing as a liberated, wealthy businessman. With pecuniary success Lopakhin witnesses a significant strain change within the society. In the company of Madame Ranevsky, Lopakhin feels self conscious, still a peasant at heart but deep down in his mind he knows that things have changed in his favour. Against this background of Lopakhins success, the bankruptcy face by Mrs. Revesky further frustrates her. When Lopakhin offers his plan to her in order to improve her financial position by the construction of villas at the cherry orchard, Mrs. Revesky refusal not further exhibits her impractical attitude and lack of business acumen but withal she is not free from her image of an aristocrat- she is still a slave of her passions she spends extravagantly ignoring her present crises. She is not merely a victim of social change around her but also of her own flaws and passions and her running back to her origin lover in Paris in t he end displays her desire to assay liberation from her past memories which have chained her throughout her life. She although unlike Nora Helmer does not want to develop into an independent, intellectual personality as she still wants approximately support system to cling on which in the end is her author lover. Moreover it seems that her running away from her past memories although is liberating her from her times of yore but she is not trying to find her true self in this liberating process. She is still otiose to discover herself which is clearly pictured as a goal by Nora Helmer in A Dolls House.In the A Dolls House written by Henrik Ibsen in 1879 at the time of the movement of Naturalism, which is regarded as a milepost in theatre for its representationofpragmaticindividuals, locations and situations,Henrikrestrictshisstorytothemiddle clear families and his writings are of a society that is partial not just by its means of living but also its outlook. In his play, Henrik deals with womens sounds as a matter of significance, which on the contrary was neglected throughout that time period. The heroin of his play, Nora Helmer suffers an inferior character and is a victim of social norms, in the beginning she struggles desperately to conform to these norms but ultimately evolves towards self liberation. Its only after eight years when Krogstad blackmails her for forging her dying fathers signature that she realises that she lived with a hypocrite and her affection and love for her economise was of least interest to him and he would no matter what consider his social reputation more important than his family. Nora changes herself to become independent, free form social constraints to explore her own goals and beliefs. throughout much of the play Nora Helmers character is interpret as subjugated by both authoritarian social conventions and manipulations of Torvald Helmer, her husband. But unlike Mrs. Ranevskys character that dust unchanged throughout the play, Nora is a dynamic character. Noras personal character sees a remarkable revolution. From a meek and submissive, childlike silly wife to her husband, she mutates into independent personality seeking self realization and inherconcludinglines Nora states Im a human be no lesstry to understand them3Noradiscardsthemale-controlledstructure of her familythatrefusesheraself-determiningindividuality. She demandsanalteration,aprogressionof her relations founded on edification and egalitarianism. BydecliningTorvald of being called as her husband andbydisagreeing withthemissinganddepartedfatherwhosefamily nameshebrought into play by means ofcounterfeitsignature, Nora has travelled the remoteness and has promoted the capacity in her to doubt the spurious conventions that since her childhood have held her in repressed and overpowered. In the play, authors award to Nora, the righttostrideon the way toherpersonalindividuality, Ibsen has provided herwith therighttodiscover her personal l anguage,todesignateherownname.Noras closing gesticulation announces her parting from the starchy role ofawife.Noraseemstorise as a principal example of liberation. Nora adamantly insists on pullingherselfawayfrom Torvalds outlook of her as a conventional wife. She on the other hand makes a decision to account herself as someone in process, in a condition of achieving, rather than of having a definite and rigid individuality. Nora walks out of the house to locate her being and educate herself. With the understanding that her matrimony had been a lie, the world is dissimilar outside, and that on that point are people who will lend her a hand to express through life, she makes a decision to develop into her own person.I think, for a woman as loving Nora who had an affectionate and caring mind that was brisk to do anything for her husband, nothing else mattered except her family. She had a fervent and dedicated would merrily forfeit everything as the reason of her existence is t o be enjoyable for her children and husband and to have fun. After discovering that Nora copied signature of her father on the loan bind, her husband, Torvald nullifies their spousal relationship without caring Noras love towards him which made her take this step. In their last converse Torvald becomes more oppressive and saysNora, I would gladly work for your sake. But no man can be expected to sacrifice his honour, even for the person he loves and she on realising the situation he wants to maintain answers him, Millions of women have through it4In my opinion, in the beginning of both the plays, the protagonists because of their situations had inauthentic personalities which progressively and eventually developed into much finer and genuine personas. Moreover with the help of depicted economic circumstances and the unusual personality of the characters, both the plays, The Cherry Orchard and A Dolls House suggest that there are two sources which receive change and freedom which are economics which comes from without and control over oneself which in contrast comes from within.Word Limit 1410